Case 3200638/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Theobald v Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200638/2023
- Decision date
- 8 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Park Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Theobald
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerned the respondent's application for the claim to be struck out on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued or that it was no longer possible to have a fair hearing.
Employment Judge S Park refused the application. The judgment states that no part of the claim is struck out, but it does not determine the substantive claims or record any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records refusal of the respondent's strike-out application only; it does not determine the disability discrimination claim on its merits. | Other | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records refusal of the respondent's strike-out application only; it does not determine the unfair dismissal claim on its merits. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records refusal of the respondent's strike-out application only; it does not determine the unlawful deduction from wages claim on its merits. | Other | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records refusal of the respondent's strike-out application only; it does not determine the working time claim on its merits. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.