Case 3200650/2020 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Ms M Harper (2) Ms B Tongo (3) Ms J Gomes v London Borough of Waltham Forest and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200650/2020
- Decision date
- 15 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Street Appearances
Parties
3 namedClaimant
(1) Ms M Harper (2) Ms B Tongo (3) Ms J Gomes
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered the position under paragraph 11 of Employment Judge Gardiner's order dated 6 October 2020. The claimants confirmed that their constructive dismissal claims related to the period after 17 September 2019, when their employment transferred to the Second Respondent.
On that basis, the tribunal found that no issue arose for determination between the claimants and the First Respondent on those constructive dismissal claims. The unfair constructive dismissal claims against the First Respondent were dismissed.
The judgment recorded that the constructive dismissal claims continue against the Second Respondent. The First Respondent remains a party to Ms Harper's disability claim, which is proceeding separately.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The unfair constructive dismissal claims were dismissed against the First Respondent only. The judgment states that the constructive dismissal claims continue against the Second Respondent and that Ms Harper's disability claim proceeds separately. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.