Case 3200656/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Fisher v Cityline Construction Limited (in CVL) and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200656/2023
- Decision date
- 11 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr R Fisher
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the Claimant appeared in person, the First Respondent did not attend, and the Second Respondent was represented by Mr P Soni.
Employment Judge Russell found that the Claimant was not an employee of the First Respondent. On that basis, all claims failed and were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself does not separately enumerate the claims and states that all claims fail and are dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself does not separately enumerate the claims and states that all claims fail and are dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself does not separately enumerate the claims and states that all claims fail and are dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.