Case 3200658/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Dragoi v Urbaser Ltd. — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200658/2021
- Decision date
- 12 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Cheunviratsakul Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Dragoi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr C Dragoi's unfair dismissal claim was presented more than three months after the effective date of termination. It was not satisfied that it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented within that time limit, so the tribunal found the claim to be out of time and without jurisdiction to hear it.
The judgment also records that, following an unsuccessful application to amend the claim, Mr Dragoi's discrimination claims were dismissed. The extracted text does not specify the discrimination ground or set out any further reasoning on those claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim was presented outside the three-month time limit from the effective date of termination and was not satisfied that it had not been reasonably practicable to present it in time, so it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Following an unsuccessful application to amend the claim, the claimant's discrimination claims were dismissed. The extracted text does not specify the basis of the discrimination allegations. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.