Case 3200660/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Edwards v Elderberry Gardens Entertainment Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200660/2020
- Decision date
- 30 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Edwards
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting remotely by Cloud Video Platform on 30 November 2020 before Employment Judge Gardiner, revoked the judgment dated 19 June 2020. The claimant, Mr T Edwards, did not attend; the respondent, Elderberry Gardens Entertainment Limited, was represented by Ms B Grossman of counsel.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claims for holiday pay, arrears of pay, and notice pay were not well founded and therefore dismissed them. No monetary award was made in respect of those claims.
The respondent's application for costs was also found not well founded and was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal said the claim for holiday pay was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal said the claim for arrears of pay was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal said the claim for notice pay was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.