Case 3200663/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Margit Chichi Ewurum v Advance Housing Support Group Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200663/2023
- Decision date
- 18 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Margit Chichi Ewurum
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 18 October 2024, at East London Hearing Centre by CVP, Employment Judge B Beyzade considered the effect of a strike out warning issued to the claimant’s representative on 26 June 2024. The judgment records that the claimant’s complaints were not struck out under Rule 37(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The tribunal also noted that case management orders were issued under separate cover. The extracted judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying complaints, any liability findings, or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Following a strike out warning dated 26 June 2024, the tribunal ordered that the claimant’s complaints were not struck out under Rule 37(1)(c). This was an interlocutory case management decision, not a merits determination of the underlying complaints. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(c) of Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.