Case 3200665/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Dean Chafer v Benfleet Scrap Co Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200665/2023
- Decision date
- 7 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cansick Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Dean Chafer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Dean Chafer was employed by Benfleet Scrap Co Limited as a driver from 10 January 2021 until his employment ended on 23 February 2023. He brought a claim of constructive unfair dismissal, alleging that the respondent’s disciplinary process and events at a meeting on 23 February 2023 breached the implied term of mutual trust and confidence and forced him to resign.
The tribunal found that the respondent’s investigation and disciplinary process were conducted fairly and appropriately. It accepted that the respondent investigated allegations of missing cash and damage to a vehicle, held an investigation meeting on 17 February 2023, suspended the claimant pending investigation, and then conducted a disciplinary hearing on 21 February 2023 at which the claimant was given the opportunity to respond. Having heard the evidence and listened to the recording of the disciplinary hearing, the tribunal found no unfairness in the way the hearing was handled.
The tribunal preferred the respondent’s evidence about the meeting on 23 February 2023. It found that the claimant was not forced to resign and that he chose to resign himself, after it was agreed that he would be paid for the remainder of that week and the following week and would not have to pay for the vehicle damage. The resignation letter was consistent with a voluntary resignation and did not mention any forced resignation. The claimant’s later grievance alleging forced resignation was not upheld.
Applying the constructive dismissal principles, including the objective question whether there had been a repudiatory breach of the implied term of trust and confidence, the tribunal held there was no breach by the respondent. It also rejected the claimant’s argument that the fact some salary was paid in cash had any relevance to the claim. The claim of constructive unfair dismissal was therefore dismissed, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes the claim as constructive unfair dismissal. Remedy was said to be for a separate hearing only if liability succeeded, but the claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
12 references- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- Malik v BCCI SA (in Liquidation)
- Varma v North Cheshire Hospitals NHS Trust
- Leeds Dental Team Ltd v Rose
- Morrow v Safeway Stores Plc
- Tullett Prebon Plc v BCG Brokers LP
- Garner v Grange Furnishing
- Wright v North Ayrshire Council
- Weathersfield Ltd v Sargent
- WE Cox Turner (International) Ltd v Crook
- Quilter Private Client Advisers Ltd v Falconer
- Kwik Save Stores v Swain and ors
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.