Case 3200669/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Arnold v Nikki Marks Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200669/2024
- Decision date
- 12 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Arnold
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs K Arnold brought claims against Nikki Marks Limited. The hearing took place by Cloud Video Platform at East London Hearing Centre on 12 September 2024. The respondent did not attend and had failed to file an ET3 response. The judgment records that the claimant withdrew the complaint of unfair dismissal before the decision was issued.
Under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996, Tribunal Judge Ross acting as an Employment Judge determined that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £390. The complaint of unfair dismissal was dismissed. No separate breakdown of remedy was given beyond the redundancy payment, and no other awards were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £390 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant withdrew the unfair dismissal complaint before judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £390
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.