Case 3200670/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Tony Sales v Rush Green Social Club Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200670/2021
- Decision date
- 26 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Peter Wilkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Tony Sales
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by Cloud Video Platform on 26 August 2021 before Employment Judge Peter Wilkinson. The respondent was not present and was not represented. The tribunal dealt with the claimant’s claims for unfair constructive dismissal brought under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and for unlawful dismissal in breach of contract.
Both claims were allowed. The tribunal recorded that the respondent was liable to the claimant in the total sum of £44,677 net. That figure comprised a basic award of £4,752, a compensatory award of £36,757, and damages for breach of contract of £3,168.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal allowed the claimant’s claim for unfair constructive dismissal brought under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The basic award and compensatory award were recorded together as £4,752 and £36,757 respectively. | Upheld | — | £41,509 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal also allowed the claim for unlawful dismissal in breach of contract and awarded damages of £3,168. | Upheld | — | £3,168 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £44,677
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,752
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £36,757
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.