Case 3200672/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Ferrari v The Food Map Co. Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200672/2024
- Decision date
- 2 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Park Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Ferrari
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 1 July 2024 before Employment Judge Park. The claimant, Ms M Ferrari, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal recorded that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so written reasons were not provided.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unpaid wages and ordered The Food Map Co. Limited to pay £656.46. It also upheld the claim for unpaid accrued annual leave and ordered payment of £67.21. In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had not provided the claimant with a written statement of particulars of employment in accordance with section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered compensation of £781.50.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant's claim for unpaid wages was well founded and ordered payment of £656.46. | Upheld | — | £656 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant's claim for unpaid accrued annual leave was well founded and ordered payment of £67.21. | Upheld | — | £67 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent had not provided a written statement of particulars of employment in accordance with section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered compensation of £781.50. | Upheld | — | £782 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,505
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.