Case 3200674/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Dhillon v OJA Global Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200674/2023
- Decision date
- 2 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Dhillon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 19 April 2023 and the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Russell therefore proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and made a determination on the material parts of the claim.
The tribunal found that OJA Global Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Mr Dhillon's wages and ordered payment of £7,777.49 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £5,034.41.
The total sum awarded was £12,811.90. The judgment states that the figure was calculated on a gross basis and that the respondent was entitled to make any deductions due for tax and national insurance before payment. The listed hearing on 15 August 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £7,777 |
| Holiday pay | Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £5,034 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,812
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.