Case 3200678/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Ocana v Legal Comfort Associates Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3200678/2024
- Decision date
- 16 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bann On
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Ocana
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. It held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the period 1 to 8 December 2023, and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum deducted of £437.64.
The judgment records that the respondent's contract claim was dismissed on withdrawal. The claimant's application for a preparation time order under regulation 74(b) ET Rules of Procedure 2024 succeeded, and the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £506.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded for the period 1 to 8 December 2023. | Upheld | — | £438 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the respondent's contract claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £944
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- regulation 74(b) ET Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.