Case 3200680/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Clark v Training for Tomorrow (UK) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200680/2020
- Decision date
- 16 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Clark
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 16 November 2020 at the East London Hearing Centre, Employment Judge Burgher entered default judgment under rule 21 because Training for Tomorrow (UK) Ltd did not enter a response. The judgment was issued in the claimant's favour in respect of her clarified claims for unpaid salary, unpaid notice and unpaid holiday pay.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a total of £1,807.39. That sum was made up of £1,320.00 for unpaid salary for February 2020, £304.62 for one week's notice, and £182.77 for three days' accrued holiday pay. The judgment records no further substantive findings or separate remedy assessment beyond the rule 21 default award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid salary for February 2020. | Upheld | — | £1,320 |
| Other | Awarded as one week's notice; the judgment does not specify a separate legal label for this head of claim. | Upheld | — | £305 |
| Holiday pay | Three days' accrued holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £183 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,807
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.