Case 3200682/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Davies v Catsteps Cafes Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200682/2020
- Decision date
- 24 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only complaint identified in the judgment was unfair dismissal. The tribunal issued a strike-out judgment under Rule 37 and recorded that, by letter dated 13 March 2020, the claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out or to request a hearing.
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the complaint of unfair dismissal was struck out. No remedy or compensation was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal issued a Rule 37 strike-out judgment. By letter dated 13 March 2020 the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but he did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.