Case 3200688/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Guy Aime Wahema Wanya v Barts Health NHS Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 3200688/2024
- Decision date
- 4 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Guy Aime Wahema Wanya
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded a judgment on liability following a hearing at East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 30 April, 1-2 May and 4 June 2025 before Employment Judge Gardiner.
The judgment states that the claimant's constructive dismissal claim was well founded. It also states that the claimant's unauthorised deduction of wages claim was not well founded and was dismissed.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment does not set out the factual findings, legal reasoning, or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the constructive dismissal claim is well founded. It is a liability judgment only and does not record any remedy amount. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the unauthorised deduction of wages claim is not well founded and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.