Case 3200693/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N LLOYD v Options Resourcing Bristol LLP and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200693/2023
- Decision date
- 14 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr N LLOYD
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claimant, Mr N Lloyd, did not attend the hearing on 19 July 2023 and had not complied with paragraph 12 of Judge Crosfill's orders. By a letter dated 18 August 2023, the Tribunal gave him an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for those reasons.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make any sufficient representations, in response. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment states that the hearing fixed for 13 November 2023 would not take place.
The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type, and it records no remedy or liability findings beyond the strike-out decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action in the extracted text. The claim was struck out after the claimant did not attend the hearing on 19 July 2023 and did not make sufficient representations after the Tribunal's letter of 18 August 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.