Case 3200716/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Krysik v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200716/2024
- Decision date
- 5 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morton Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Krysik
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the first claim referred to in the written judgment because it had not been presented within the relevant time limit. The extracted text does not identify that claim by type, but records that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it.
The Tribunal also dismissed the race discrimination claim. It found that the claim was presented outside the statutory three-month time limit in s 123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010 and that it would not be just and equitable to extend time under s 123(1)(b).
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The first numbered judgment item dismisses a claim for lack of jurisdiction because it was not presented within the applicable time limit, but the extracted text does not identify the claim type. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the claim was presented outside the statutory three-month time limit and the Tribunal found it would not be just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s 123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010
- s 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.