Case 3200726/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Johnson v Newark Youth London Limited and 7 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200726/2023
- Decision date
- 6 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howden-Evans Representation
Parties
9 namedClaimant
Mr J Johnson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in public before Employment Judge Howden-Evans on 6 June 2024 at the East London Hearing Centre by CVP. The judgment records that the claim was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The extracted text does not set out the underlying factual allegations or identify the pleaded causes of action. It therefore only supports a neutral record that the tribunal decided to strike out the claim at the preliminary stage, rather than any substantive merits determination.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and the extracted text does not contain any remedy findings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The preliminary hearing judgment states that the claim was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.