Case 3200731/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Nasima Sultana v Redspot Care Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3200731/2025
- Decision date
- 17 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Nasima Sultana
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs Nasima Sultana, brought a claim against Redspot Care Limited for unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of arrears of pay for April, May, June, July, September and October 2024. The Final Hearing took place at the East London Hearing Centre by Cloud Video Platform on 17 March 2026 before Employment Judge B Beyzade. The claimant appeared in person, supported by her son Mr Amman Nawaz; the respondent did not attend and was not represented.
The Tribunal was satisfied that the respondent had been served with the Notice of Hearing and had not contacted the Tribunal. After waiting in excess of 10 minutes past the scheduled start time, and on the claimant's application made at the Bar, the Tribunal determined to proceed in the respondent's absence under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 (as amended).
The Tribunal held that the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages succeeded and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the sum of £3,340.37, subject to any required deductions for tax and national insurance, provided the respondent remits any such amount to HMRC and accounts to the claimant for any such payment. Reasons were given orally; written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unauthorised deductions from wages (arrears of pay) for the period April, May, June, July, September and October 2024. Heard in the respondent's absence under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. | Upheld | — | £3,340 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,340
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.