Case 3200732/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A. Finkel v Elliss Studio Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200732/2023
- Decision date
- 18 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A. Finkel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss A. Finkel brought claims against Elliss Studio Limited for unauthorised deduction from wages and breach of contract. The case was heard at East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 18 August 2023 before Employment Judge Massarella, with Mr R. Finkel appearing for the claimant and Ms Isabel Baylis for the respondent.
The tribunal recorded that the unauthorised deduction from wages claim was dismissed on withdrawal. It also found that the breach of contract claim was not well-founded and dismissed it. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claim of unauthorised deduction from wages was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the breach of contract claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.