Case 3200736/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Hennebry v Delamode Anglia Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3200736/2024
- Decision date
- 3 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emery Members
- Panel members
- Ms S Harwood, Mr T Brown
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Hennebry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was listed for a final hearing by CVP on 5 May 2026. The notice of hearing was sent by email on 17 April 2026 and the CVP link was sent on 1 May 2026. The claimant did not attend, and the Tribunal recorded that she had also failed to attend a previous hearing on 6 November 2025.
On the morning of the hearing the Tribunal contacted the claimant by email and telephone. She did not answer the telephone or respond to emails. The respondent submitted that the claimant had failed to attend and that the Tribunal had made practicable enquiries about the reason for her absence.
The Tribunal applied Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, noting its power to dismiss a claim or proceed in a party's absence after considering available information about the reasons for non-attendance. It also referred to Roberts v Skelmersdale College and Cooke v Glenrose Fish Co Ltd on the discretion to dismiss and the approach of seeking to contact the absent claimant.
Employment Judge Emery found that the claimant was aware of the hearing, had not contacted the Tribunal or the parties to say she could not attend, and had not responded to the Tribunal's attempts to contact her. In the absence of evidence of a good reason, the Tribunal dismissed all claims under Rule 47. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment dismisses all claims under Rule 47 because of the claimant's non-attendance. It does not set out merits findings on this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment dismisses all claims under Rule 47 because of the claimant's non-attendance. It does not set out merits findings on this claim. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Roberts v Skelmersdale College [2003] EWCA Civ 954
- Cooke v Glenrose Fish Co Ltd [2004] IRLR 866
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.