Case 3200738/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Majid v WeTheIntrepid Ltd OPEN PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200738/2023
- Decision date
- 18 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Majid
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the open preliminary hearing on 18 July 2023, Employment Judge S Shore heard the case in public by video. The respondent did not appear.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claim of unauthorised deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded and succeeded. The judgment records that the amount due was £2,201.46 in unpaid wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent, WeTheIntrepid Ltd, to pay that sum to the claimant without deduction of income tax or National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant's claim of unauthorised deduction from wages under section 13 ERA 1996 well-founded and ordered payment of £2,201.46 in unpaid wages without deduction of income tax or National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £2,201 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,201
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.