Case 3200739/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Clayden v STA Travel Limited (in liquidation) and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200739/2021
- Decision date
- 26 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Elgot Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr G Clayden
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim for a protective award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, saying that the first respondent failed to comply with section 188 consultation requirements when handling redundancies. The tribunal held that the claim succeeded.
Although the claim was presented out of time, the tribunal was satisfied that it was not reasonably practicable to present it within the statutory time limit and that it was reasonable to present it by 8 March 2021. The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 2 September 2020, and the tribunal found that he and the other salaried employees were employed at a single establishment where the first respondent proposed to dismiss 20 or more employees within 90 days or less.
The tribunal found that the first respondent had completely failed to comply with the consultation requirements of section 188. It made a protective award for the claimant, with a protected period of 90 days from 2 September 2020 to 1 December 2020, noting that no mitigating factors had been put forward to justify reducing the maximum period.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim for a protective award pursuant to section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for alleged failure to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements in handling redundancies. Classified as other because the taxonomy has no specific protective award or collective consultation category. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189(5) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.