Case 3200744/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Renard Kabza v Insight IT Recruitment Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200744/2020
- Decision date
- 2 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Knight Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Renard Kabza
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at East London Hearing Centre by Cloud Video Platform on 2 December 2020 before Employment Judge S Knight. The Claimant, Renard Kabza, appeared in person. The Respondent, Insight IT Recruitment Limited, did not attend and was unrepresented.
The tribunal found that the Respondent wrongfully dismissed the Claimant and also made an unauthorised deduction from his wages. The judgment records both claims as successful and does not set out any further reasoning beyond those conclusions.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £1,600 gross in total. That sum was composed of £640 for unauthorised deductions from wages and £960 for wrongful dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal held that the Respondent wrongfully dismissed the Claimant and awarded £960 gross for that claim. | Upheld | — | £960 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant’s wages and awarded £640 gross for that claim. | Upheld | — | £640 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,600
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.