Case 3200756/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Gowers v Five Stars Care Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3200756/2022
- Decision date
- 26 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Townley Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Gowers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a telephone hearing on 26 September 2022 before Employment Judge Townley, the tribunal determined Mrs C Gowers' claims against Five Stars Care Services Ltd. The judgment records that the claimant succeeded on two holiday pay claims: unpaid holiday taken in November and December 2021, for 7 days at £57 per day, and accrued but untaken holiday pay for January 2022, for 2 days at £57 per day.
The tribunal also upheld claims for contractual expenses incurred but unpaid, relating to petrol, in the sum of £66.20, and for contractual overtime worked but unpaid in the sum of £30.00. The claim for unlawful deduction of wages in the sum of £517.75 and the claim for 'travel money' in the sum of £77.00 were found not well-founded and dismissed. The total net amount payable to the claimant was £609.20.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Unpaid contractual overtime worked. | Upheld | — | £30 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for £517.75 was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday taken in November/December 2021; 7 days at £57 per day. | Upheld | — | £399 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken holiday pay for January 2022; 2 days at £57 per day. | Upheld | — | £114 |
| Breach of contract | Unpaid contractual expenses relating to petrol. | Upheld | — | £66 |
| Other | Claim for 'travel money' (£77.00) was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £609
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.