Case 3200757/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jose Penalva v London School of Commerce and IT Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200757/2022
- Decision date
- 12 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Townley Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jose Penalva
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Jose Penalva’s breach of contract claim against London School of Commerce and IT Limited was heard at East London Hearing Centre on 15 November 2022 before Employment Judge Townley. The tribunal held that the claim was not well-founded and dismissed it.
The respondent applied for costs. The claimant was given an opportunity to address that application and his objections were noted. The tribunal recorded that there was a delay in the respondent’s solicitors sending the schedule of costs, and that the claimant was asked to remain in the room and was put on notice that he would be required to give evidence about his means and ability to pay once the schedule had been received. He left the tribunal before that happened, and no message was received explaining why.
The costs application was therefore considered in the claimant’s absence and without submissions on means. The tribunal ordered the claimant to pay £12,351.60 in costs under rule 76(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, on the basis that he had acted unreasonably in either bringing the proceedings or conducting them. The judgment also stated that he could apply within 14 days for reconsideration of the costs decision, supported by a statement of means and an explanation of why he left the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claim was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,352
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reg 76(1)(a) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.