Case 3200763/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Margaret Loveday v Essex County Council — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200763/2020
- Decision date
- 18 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Knight Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Margaret Loveday
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant brought a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages, saying a deduction had been taken from her redundancy payment after her employment ended. The Respondent applied at the final hearing to strike out the claim for want of jurisdiction, arguing that payments referable to redundancy are excluded from the statutory definition of wages.
The Tribunal found that the jurisdiction point had been raised unacceptably late and noted the Claimant had no advance notice of it. It also recorded concerns about errors in the Respondent's correspondence and payroll processes, but held that those matters did not affect the Tribunal's jurisdiction.
The Tribunal concluded that the deduction was from a redundancy payment and therefore was not a deduction from wages within s 27 Employment Rights Act 1996. It also stated that even if the claim were amended to breach of contract, the Tribunal would lack jurisdiction because any breach arose after termination. The claim was struck out for want of jurisdiction, with the Claimant permitted to apply for costs or preparation time within 28 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim concerned an alleged deduction from the Claimant's redundancy payment. It was struck out for want of jurisdiction because payments referable to redundancy are excluded from 'wages' under s 27 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s 27 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 article 3
- Peninsula Business Services Ltd v Sweeney [2004] IRLR 49
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.