Case 3200804/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Murdock v Prospero Recruitment Ltd and 2 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 3200804/2021
- Decision date
- 4 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reid Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr R Murdock
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a judgment dated 4 May 2022, Employment Judge Reid found that Mr R Murdock was not a disabled person within the meaning of s6(1) Equality Act 2010 at the time of the matters complained of in his claim presented on 13 March 2021. The case was heard at East London Hearing Centre and the claimant appeared in person, with the three respondents separately represented.
Because the tribunal found that the disability definition was not met, the claimant's disability discrimination claims against Prospero Recruitment Ltd, Unity Schools Partnership and ePayMe Ltd were dismissed. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found that the claimant was not a disabled person within the meaning of s6(1) Equality Act 2010 at the time of the matters complained of in the claim presented on 13 March 2021. His disability discrimination claims against all three respondents were therefore dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s6(1) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.