Case 3200808/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Bignall v London Ambulance Service NHS Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200808/2021
- Decision date
- 5 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dated
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mr. M Wood, Mr. G Bishop
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Bignall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant withdrew her unauthorised deduction from wages claim, and that claim was dismissed upon withdrawal.
The remaining claims were dismissed. The tribunal stated that the victimisation claim under s.27 Equality Act 2010, the health and safety detriment claim under s.44(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996, the public interest disclosure detriment claim under s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996, the unfair dismissal claim under s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996, and the notice pay claim all failed and were dismissed.
The judgment does not set out reasons or any remedy award in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim of unauthorised deduction from wages was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment identifies the claim as victimisation contrary to s.27 of the Equality Act 2010 and does not specify a protected characteristic in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Health and safety detriment claim under s.44(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Public interest disclosure detriment claim under s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Unfair dismissal claim contrary to s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim for notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.27 Equality Act 2010
- s.44(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.