Case 3200814/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Coverdale v Top British Events Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3200814/2022
- Decision date
- 18 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Coverdale
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard on 18 July 2022 at East London Hearing Centre before Employment Judge Russell under Rule 21. The respondent did not attend and was not represented. The judgment records that Miss J Coverdale succeeded on all three claims determined in the judgment.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £4,383.17. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and awarded £2,916.97 in respect of one month’s notice.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered £5,473.24, described as 24.5 days for 2021 and 16 days carried forward for 2020. The total awarded by the judgment was £12,773.38.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered £5,473.24 for 24.5 days in 2021 and 16 days carried forward from 2020. | Upheld | — | £5,473 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £4,383.17. | Upheld | — | £4,383 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and awarded £2,916.97 in respect of one month’s notice. | Upheld | — | £2,917 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,773
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.