Mr. U. Gol v NSL Limited — 2025

The tribunal found that the claimant had not proved that Sarah Smith instructed or forced him to complete other employees’ online training courses, or that she made him commit a fraudulent act or breach GDPR. The tribunal accepted the respondent’s evidence that the claimant, as training officer, was asked to help colleagues gain access to the system and encourage them to complete their own courses. The grievance investigation into those allegations was found to be thorough, and the only point partially upheld internally concerned poor practice in storing and emailing temporary passwords.

The tribunal found that Asim Ramzan and Mohammed Ramzan had bullied the claimant, but also found that the respondent took appropriate action. Asim Ramzan was suspended and disciplinary proceedings began before he resigned; Mohammed Ramzan was disciplined and transferred to another base. The tribunal found no evidence that Sarah Smith caused or was involved in that bullying, and found the later allegation that threatening calls were made on her behalf was not made out.

The tribunal further found that both grievances were handled properly, reasonably and promptly. Looking at the case objectively as a whole, the tribunal concluded that the respondent had not committed a repudiatory breach of the implied term of trust and confidence, so the claimant was not constructively dismissed and the claim failed.