Mr L Wright v Wharfstorm Ltd — 2022

Case reference: 3200820/2021
Decision date: 19 December 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Burgher

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr L Wright

Respondent

Wharfstorm Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By a letter dated 14 September 2021, the Tribunal gave Mr L Wright an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 14 September 2021 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.

The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Acting Regional Employment Judge Burgher struck out the claim on 19 December 2022.

The extracted text does not record any determination on the merits, any finding on the underlying substance of the claim, or any monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type in the text provided; it records only that the claim was struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order and because it had not been actively pursued.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.