Case 3200831/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Jalal Uddin v Profile Printing Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3200831/2022
- Decision date
- 12 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Travers Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jalal Uddin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Travers heard the case remotely by Cloud Video Platform at East London Hearing Centre on 12 August 2022. The claimant, Jalal Uddin, was unrepresented; the respondent was represented by counsel instructed by DAC Beachcroft LLP.
The only substantive outcome recorded in the judgment is that the claims for unfair dismissal, a redundancy payment, and notice pay were dismissed. The extracted text does not include further findings of fact or reasons for those dismissals.
No financial award was made, and the judgment does not record any separate remedy figures for the individual claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to a claim for 'notice pay'; this has been classified as breach of contract because the extracted text does not use a more specific label such as wrongful dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.