Case 3200838/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Zdaniewicz v MB Site Solutions Limited DEFAULT — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200838/2020
- Decision date
- 21 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Zdaniewicz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not enter a response. The tribunal therefore issued a Rule 21 default judgment in the claimant’s favour in respect of his unpaid salary, unpaid holiday and unpaid expenses claims. The hearing listed for 28 October 2020 was cancelled.
The judgment itemised the award as 3 weeks unpaid salary for December 2019 (£1,500), December travel expenses (£180), 2 weeks unpaid holiday in December 2019 (£1,000), 2 weeks unpaid salary for January 2020 (£1,000), and January travel expenses (£120). It then deducted £250 paid on 10 January 2020 and £550 paid on 17 January 2020, producing a total sum due of £3,000.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment covered 3 weeks unpaid salary for December 2019 (£1,500) and 2 weeks unpaid salary for January 2020 (£1,000); the judgment did not apportion the final award between claim heads. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Default judgment covered 2 weeks unpaid holiday in December 2019 (£1,000); the award was not separately itemised in the final total. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Default judgment covered unpaid travel expenses for December 2019 (£180) and January 2020 (£120); the judgment did not specify a separate statutory category for the expenses head. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,000
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.