Case 3200840/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Gladstone v Premier Carriers (Same Day) International Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200840/2023
- Decision date
- 2 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Knowles Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Gladstone
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant’s period of work in or around 2017 and 2018, during which he paid tax and national insurance as a self-employed person, did not break continuity of employment. It held that he was in fact an employee of the respondent during that period and was not self-employed.
On that basis, the claimant’s continuous employment was found to run from 1 April 2015 to 2 February 2023. The tribunal further held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment.
The amount of the redundancy payment was assessed at £5,995.50. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had already paid £2,569.50, leaving a balance due of £3,426.00.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the outstanding balance of £3,426.00.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,995.50. It recorded that £2,569.50 had already been paid, leaving a balance of £3,426.00 ordered to be paid. | Upheld | — | £3,426 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,426
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.