Case 3200842/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Van’t Hoogerhuijs v Bellboi Limited DEFAULT — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200842/2021
- Decision date
- 6 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Van’t Hoogerhuijs
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a rule 21 default judgment because Bellboi Limited did not enter a response. It recorded that Ms A Van't Hoogerhuijs worked for the respondent from 12 March 2019 to 4 January 2021, earned an average gross weekly wage of £315, and was dismissed by reason of redundancy following the respondent's cessation of business.
Judgment was entered in the claimant's favour for unpaid pension contributions of £629.85, unpaid salary for 2 January 2021 of £115.50, accrued holiday pay of £563.64 for 53.68 hours at £10.50 per hour, and contractual redundancy pay of £1,260 calculated at four weeks' pay. The total sum ordered was £2,568.99.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid pension contributions awarded in the rule 21 default judgment. | Upheld | — | £630 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid salary for 2 January 2021 awarded in the rule 21 default judgment. | Upheld | — | £116 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued holiday pay of 53.68 hours at £10.50 per hour. | Upheld | — | £564 |
| Breach of contract | Contractual redundancy pay of 4 x £315. | Upheld | — | £1,260 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,569
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.