Case 3200843/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Guevarra v Olive Banquet Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200843/2021
- Decision date
- 8 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Guevarra
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr J Guevarra's unfair dismissal complaint. In a letter dated 26 March 2021, the tribunal gave him an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why that claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The tribunal recorded that Mr Guevarra did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the unfair dismissal complaint was struck out.
The judgment states that the claimant's remaining claims were still listed for hearing on 15 September 2021, to be heard by telephone with a time estimate of one hour. The judgment does not determine those remaining claims or record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant did not make written representations, make sufficient representations, or request a hearing after being given the opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.