Case 3200852/2019 · Employment Tribunal
1. Mr D O’Sullivan 2. Mr W Singleton v Ford Motor Company Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200852/2019
- Decision date
- 13 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brook Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mr K Rose, Mr D Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
1. Mr D O’Sullivan 2. Mr W Singleton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment for case nos. 3200852/2019 and 3200853/2019 records that the claims were dismissed upon withdrawal after the parties reached confidential terms of settlement. It was heard at East London Hearing Centre on 13 November 2019 before Employment Judge Brook, with members Mr K Rose and Mr D Ross. The claimants were represented by Mr Roberts of counsel and the respondent by Ms M Tether of counsel.
The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on liability, remedy, or legal test. It is a short disposal judgment only, recording the withdrawal-based dismissal and no further orders or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment only states that the claims were dismissed upon withdrawal after the parties reached confidential terms of settlement; it does not identify the underlying substantive claim heads in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.