Case 3200853/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms M Jemoh (Director) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200853/2023
- Decision date
- 21 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Professor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim by Ms R Remutyte against OJA GLOBAL LTD for unlawful deductions from wages was upheld at a hearing on 12 September 2023 at the East London Hearing Centre by CVP before Employment Judge Professor A C Neal. The respondent was represented by Ms M Jemoh, described in the judgment as Director, and the claimant appeared in person.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £51,873.84 gross for wages unlawfully deducted during the period 1 February 2023 to 21 July 2023 inclusive. The annex to the judgment set out the computation on the basis that the claimant was paid £110,000 per annum, or £9,166 per month gross, and that payment for the worked period from 1 February 2023 to 14 July 2023 amounted to £49,970 gross.
For the maternity period from 15 July 2023 to 21 July 2023, the annex recorded a normal full pay entitlement for seven days of £2,115.38 gross and gross statutory maternity pay due at 90% of £1,903.84. The tribunal recorded that zero payment had been made and that the total gross wages due were £51,873.84, which was the sum ordered to be paid.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment is headed with joined case numbers 3200853/2023 and 3201344/2023, but the extracted decision text records only an unlawful deductions from wages claim. | Upheld | — | £51,874 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £51,874
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.