Case 3200854/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Green v PL Logistical Solutions Ltd DEFAULT — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200854/2020
- Decision date
- 25 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Green
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not enter a response, so the tribunal entered default judgment under Rule 21 in favour of Mr J Green in respect of his unpaid wages claims. The judgment records awards for unpaid wages for January 2020 of £834.95, unpaid sick pay for February 2020 of £510.20, and unpaid sick pay for March 2020 of £510.20.
The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay 4 weeks' pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 because it had failed to issue the claimant with a written statement of particulars of employment. That element was calculated at 4 x £320, giving £1,280. The total sum ordered was £3,135.35.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under Rule 21 in respect of unpaid wages claims, including unpaid wages for January 2020 (£834.95) and unpaid sick pay for February 2020 (£510.20) and March 2020 (£510.20). | Upheld | — | £1,855 |
| Other | Award of 4 weeks' pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 because the respondent failed to issue a written statement of particulars of employment; calculated at 4 x £320. | Upheld | — | £1,280 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,135
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.