Case 3200859/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Bascherini v Andina Ceviche Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200859/2024
- Decision date
- 9 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Smyth Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Bascherini
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at East London Hearing Centre via the Cloud Video Platform on 3 September 2024 before Employment Judge K Smyth. The Claimant, Mr A Bascherini, appeared in person and the Respondent did not appear.
The tribunal upheld the Claimant’s unlawful deduction from wages claim and ordered Andina Ceviche Ltd to pay him the gross sum of £1,715.63. The judgment does not set out additional reasoning in the extracted text.
The tribunal also found that the Respondent dismissed the Claimant by reason of redundancy and ordered it to pay the gross sum of £8,487.41. The extracted judgment does not separate the award into components beyond these two gross sums, and no other claims or remedies are recorded in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant the gross sum of £1,715.63. | Upheld | — | £1,716 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the Claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and ordered the Respondent to pay the gross sum of £8,487.41. | Upheld | — | £8,487 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,203
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.