Case 3200860/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Sirtoual v WG Catering Solutions Limited T/A Wood Grill — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200860/2019
- Decision date
- 27 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hallen
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Sirtoual
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the East London Hearing Centre on 8 August 2019, Employment Judge Hallen sat alone. The claimant, Mr B Sirtoual, appeared in person with the assistance of an interpreter, and the respondent was represented by Mr P Bailey, Senior Manager.
The extracted judgment records that the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £2,733.33 on or before 15 August 2019. It then states that the Employment Tribunal claim is dismissed. No reasons, claim labels, or breakdown of the sum are set out in the extracted text, so the basis for the order and the effect of the dismissal wording are not clear from the page alone.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment contains only the operative order and no reasons; it records an order that the respondent pay £2,733.33 by 15 August 2019, followed immediately by a statement that the Employment Tribunal claim is dismissed. The precise claim type and the intended effect of the dismissal wording cannot be resolved from the extracted text alone. | Other | — | £2,733 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,733
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.