Case 3200879/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Holt and others in schedule attached at appendix 2 v Readie Construction Limited (in administration) and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3200879/2024
- Decision date
- 22 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor Members
- Panel members
- Ms J Houzer, Mrs B Saund
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr O Holt and others in schedule attached at appendix 2
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the complaint that Readie Construction Limited failed to comply with the requirements of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well-founded. It found that the First Respondent had not shown special circumstances that made compliance not reasonably practicable.
The tribunal made a protective award for all claimants in the schedule attached to the judgment. The protected period was 35 days from 6 February 2024, and the parties did not ask the tribunal to enumerate the award for each claimant. Recoupment applies.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal found the First Respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made a protective award. The award was not enumerated for each claimant. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- special circumstances
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.