Case 3200888/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Binkiewicz v Reliance Employment Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200888/2021
- Decision date
- 15 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Binkiewicz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the East London Hearing Centre on 4 November 2021, before Employment Judge Jones sitting alone, the tribunal found that Reliance Employment Ltd had refused the claimant his statutory right to annual leave in 2019 and 2020. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay him in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave.
Applying Regulation 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, the tribunal ordered the respondent to permit the claimant to carry forward 28 days' annual leave accrued in 2019 and 2020 and to pay the claimant for that leave. The judgment records no separate monetary figure or overall award beyond that order.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The tribunal found that the respondent refused to permit the claimant the statutory right to annual leave in 2019 and 2020. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave and ordered payment for the leave carried forward under Regulation 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Regulation 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.