Case 3200892/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Rahman v Family Kebab & Fish Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200892/2021
- Decision date
- 27 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hallen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Rahman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the East London Hearing Centre on 26 November 2021, Employment Judge Hallen sat alone. The claimant, Mr T Rahman, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend or take part. In the judgment dated 27 November 2021, the tribunal found that Mr Rahman had been unfairly constructively dismissed and that unlawful deductions had been made from his wages contrary to the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal awarded £4,400 in total. The judgment records £1,200 net for unpaid wages for the period 1 to 31 December 2020, £1,200 for four weeks' notice pay, £1,200 as a basic award, and £800 for accrued holiday pay. The judgment does not apportion those sums between the two claims, so the record preserves the heads of award as stated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant had been unfairly constructively dismissed. The judgment records a 4 weeks' notice pay award of £1,200 and a basic award of £1,200, but does not split those sums by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that unlawful deductions had been made from the claimant's wages contrary to the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records £1,200 net unpaid wages for 1 to 31 December 2020 and £800 accrued holiday pay, but does not split those sums by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,400
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,200
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.