Case 3200915/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Jakubowska v New Clean Dealership Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200915/2019
- Decision date
- 3 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hallen
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Jakubowska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hallen sat alone at East London Hearing Centre on 15 August 2019. The claimant, Mrs J Jakubowska, appeared in person. The respondent did not attend and was not represented.
The tribunal held that the claimant had been unfairly dismissed. No separate written reasoning or legal test is set out in the extracted judgment text, but the outcome recorded is a finding in the claimant's favour on unfair dismissal.
The tribunal then awarded compensation in specified components: unpaid wages of £252.00 for the period 8 August 2018 to 23 February 2019, holiday pay of £171.00, a basic award of £342.00, a compensatory award for loss of four weeks' wages of £684.00, and £350.00 for loss of statutory rights.
The total awarded compensation was £1,799.00.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed. It awarded compensation made up of unpaid wages of £252.00 for 8 August 2018 to 23 February 2019, holiday pay of £171.00, a basic award of £342.00, a compensatory award of £684.00, and £350.00 for loss of statutory rights, giving a total of £1,799.00. | Upheld | — | £1,799 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,799
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £342
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £684
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.