Case 3200928/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss F Flack v Refined Media Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200928/2019
- Decision date
- 17 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss F Flack
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Martin, sitting alone at East London Hearing Centre on 28 August 2019, heard evidence from Miss F Flack, who appeared in person. The respondent did not attend and was not represented. The claimant clarified the sums claimed in her claim form and in her email of 21 July 2019.
The tribunal found the claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages to be well-founded and awarded £1,275.85 net of income tax and national insurance. It also found that her complaint of breach of the working time regulations in respect of holiday pay was well-founded and awarded one day’s holiday pay in the net sum of £67.15. The total award recorded by the judgment is £1,343.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as a net sum of £1,275.85. | Upheld | — | £1,276 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded one day’s holiday pay in the net sum of £67.15 under the working time regulations. | Upheld | — | £67 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,343
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.