Case 3200932/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Mulligan v People Tree Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200932/2023
- Decision date
- 3 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Emery REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Mulligan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 3 October 2023 at East London Hearing Centre, held by CVP, Employment Judge M Emery determined Ms T Mulligan’s claim for a redundancy payment under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996. The respondent did not appear or provide representation.
The Tribunal accepted the relevant calculation figures recorded in the judgment: the claimant’s start date was 4 March 2008, her effective date of termination was 9 April 2023, she was aged 60 at dismissal, her annual salary was £58,200, and the statutory weekly cap was £643.00.
Applying the redundancy payment formula, the Tribunal calculated 15 years’ employment at 1.5 weeks per year by reference to the statutory weekly cap, producing a redundancy payment of £14,467.50. The judgment records no other awards or claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The Tribunal determined under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996 that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £14,468 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,468
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.