Case 3200934/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Blows v N M A Group Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200934/2020
- Decision date
- 17 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Blows
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in Mr J Blows v N M A Group Ltd. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £7,041.70.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,400. In the same judgment it found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,300.
The tribunal further ordered £200 for unpaid holiday entitlement. The final item in the extracted text states that the respondent had not paid the claimant wages in the sum of £950; the text does not include any additional reasoning beyond that statement.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of £7,041.70 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £7,042 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered £2,400 damages. | Upheld | — | £2,400 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,300. | Upheld | — | £3,300 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered £200 for failure to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £200 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted text states that the respondent had not paid the claimant wages in the sum of £950; the usual concluding order wording does not appear in the extracted text, but the item is treated as a further wages award. | Upheld | — | £950 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,892
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.