Case 3200957/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Rodney Faukungi v Education Dreams Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200957/2023
- Decision date
- 4 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Illing Representation
- Venue
- East London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Rodney Faukungi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt East London on 4 October 2023, Employment Judge Illing, sitting alone, heard Mr Rodney Faukungi's complaint against Education Dreams Ltd. The respondent did not attend. The Tribunal held that there had been unauthorised deductions from wages in the period 15 April 2023 to 28 April 2023.
The Tribunal ordered Education Dreams Ltd to pay £1,000, being the gross sum deducted from the claimant's wages, and a further £250 to compensate him for financial loss attributable to the deduction. The judgment also records that the claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on the £1,000 payment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 15 April 2023 to 28 April 2023 and ordered payment of the deducted sum plus a separate amount for financial loss. | Upheld | — | £1,250 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,250
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £250
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.